PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 2. The petition is filed in the nature of Public Interest Litigation. 3. The petitioner has stated in the memo of petition that encroachment has been made in river Mahi and, therefore, the petitioner has filed the present petition with a prayer that appropriate direction be issued to the concerned authorities to protect the la...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: This Court has heard Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, learned Senior Advocate with Mr. Shubham Priyadarshi, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned Advocate for the State. 2. The challenge made in the present writ petition is the order dated 02.06.2020 bearing Memo No. 173 passed by the Inspector General of Police, Central Range, Patna, by which the petitioner has been inflicted with the punish...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: This Court has heard Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, learned Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. Shailesh Kumar, learned Advocate as well as Mrs. Babita Kumari, learned Advocate for the State. 2. Since both the impugned orders inflicting the punishment of dismissal from services are arising out of the one and the same occurrence, leading to identical charges and depa...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: This Court has heard Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, learned Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. Shailesh Kumar, learned Advocate as well as Mrs. Babita Kumari, learned Advocate for the State. 2. Since both the impugned orders inflicting the punishment of dismissal from services are arising out of the one and the same occurrence, leading to identical charges and depa...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in which the petitioner has prayed that the order dated 18.12.2024, passed by the Additional Chief Executive Officer-cum-Secretary (Respondent No.2) be quashed and the respondents be restrained from giving effect to the said order during pendency of the present petition. 2. The facts of the present case in nutshell are as under:...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: Heard the parties. 2. In compliance with the order of this Court, a supplementary show-cause affidavit has been filed, categorically showing that all the admissible amount under different head have been paid to the petitioner. 3. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that a copy of the supplementary affidavit has been served just in a while and he prays for a short adjournment. 4. Having considered t...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: Heard the parties. 2. The present application is filed for initiation of a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for their willful and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Court dated 18.11.2024, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 17349 of 2024, whereby this Court directed the District Magistrate, Darbhanga to consider the claim of the petitioner in the light of Rule 9(7) of the CCA Rules, 2005 preferab...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: Heard Mr. Raj Kumar Rajesh, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr Binod Murari Mishra, the learned counsel for the Informant and Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh-1, the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The present application has been filed against the order dated 13.09.2024 passed by learned C.J.M., Nalanda at Biharsharif in Deepnagar P.S. Case No. 338 of 2022 (G.R. No. 1005424/2020) whereby cognizance under Se...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: Heard Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Binod Murari, the learned counsel for the Informant and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The present application has been filed for quashing of F.I.R. of Special Case No. 19 of 1997, dated 09.06.1997 for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 120(B), 201, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477A and 465 ...
India, Sept. 22 -- Jamshedpur, September 22, 2025: In a landmark initiative to strengthen governance, infrastructure, MSME competitiveness and sustainability in Jharkhand, XLRI Jamshedpur, Jharkhand Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (JIIDCO), Jharkhand Industrial Area Development Authority (JIADA), and Invest India jointly launched 15 live projects under the Jharkhand Industrial Policy Lab.The orientation and briefing session was hosted at XLRI Jamshedpur, beginning with an intro...